Indication for a Pneumocystis Prophylaxis Therapy in Patients with Vascular Anomalies Treated with PIK3/AKT/mTOR Pathway Inhibitors: Experts' Opinion and Systematic Review from the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Vascular anomalies (VAs) are increasingly being treated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors. These drugs have immunosuppressive properties and thus theoretically overexpose patients to opportunistic infections, especially Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). PJP prophylaxis use lacks consensus. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of PJP in patients receiving mTOR/PI3K/AKT inhibitors for VAs and determine any indication for pneumocystis prophylaxis in this population. METHODS: The study was conducted in 2 parts: (1) we sent a survey to a panel of international experts of VAs asking about their use of pneumocystis prophylaxis drugs and (2) we performed a systematic review of the literature of all published cases of patients receiving these drugs for VA to estimate the prevalence of PJP in this population. RESULTS: Answers from 68 experts were analyzed: 21 (30.9%) answered they always add PJP prophylaxis when prescribing mTOR inhibitors, 20 (29.4%) case-by-case, and 27 (39.7%) never. For the systematic review, among 3,053 reports screened, 217 were included involving 1,189 patients (1,143 received sirolimus, 38 everolimus, 4 alpelisib, 4 miransertib). Among the 1,189 cases, 2 (0.2%) PJP were reported: one under sirolimus and one under everolimus. Thus, the prevalence of PJP was estimated at 0.88 cases/1,000 patients under sirolimus (95% CI: -0.84 to 2.59) and 26.31 cases/1,000 under everolimus (95% CI: -24.58 to 77.18). Patients with PJP never received prophylaxis drugs. We found no PJP cases under alpelisib and miransertib. PJP prophylaxis was given in 218 (18.3%) cases, more frequently for children (91.3 vs. 77.2% in the non-prophylaxis group, p = 0.012), mostly trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (186 patients, 85.3%). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that even if PJP is a rare event, it may occur in patients with VAs treated with an mTOR inhibitor. Although our results cannot allow for revising guidelines, prophylaxis with TMP-SMX might be appropriate for a subgroup of patients with risk factors for PJP.

Safety Signal Generation for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Following Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccination: Postmarketing Surveillance Using the French Pharmacovigilance Spontaneous Reporting Database.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recently described sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) as a possible adverse effect of COVID-19 vaccines. Recent discordant pharmacoepidemiologic studies invite robust clinical investigations of SSNHL after COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. This postmarketing surveillance study, overseen by French public health authorities, is the first to clinically document postvaccination SSNHL and examine the role of potential risk factors. OBJECTIVE: This nationwide study aimed to assess the relationship between SSNHL and exposure to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and estimate the reporting rate (Rr) of SSNHL after mRNA vaccination per 1 million doses (primary outcome). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all suspected cases of SSNHL after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination spontaneously reported in France between January 2021 and February 2022 based on a comprehensive medical evaluation, including the evaluation of patient medical history, side and range of hearing loss, and hearing recovery outcomes after a minimum period of 3 months. The quantification of hearing loss and assessment of hearing recovery outcomes were performed according to a grading system modified from the Siegel criteria. A cutoff of 21 days was used for the delay onset of SSNHL. The primary outcome was estimated using the total number of doses of each vaccine administered during the study period in France as the denominator. RESULTS: From 400 extracted cases for tozinameran and elasomeran, 345 (86.3%) spontaneous reports were selected. After reviewing complementary data, 49.6% (171/345) of documented cases of SSNHL were identified. Of these, 83% (142/171) of SSNHL cases occurred after tozinameran vaccination: Rr=1.45/1,000,000 injections; no difference for the rank of injections; complete recovery in 22.5% (32/142) of cases; median delay onset before day 21=4 days (median age 51, IQR 13-83 years); and no effects of sex. A total of 16.9% (29/171) of SSNHL cases occurred after elasomeran vaccination: Rr=1.67/1,000,000 injections; rank effect in favor of the first injection (P=.03); complete recovery in 24% (7/29) of cases; median delay onset before day 21=8 days (median age 47, IQR 33-81 years); and no effects of sex. Autoimmune, cardiovascular, or audiovestibular risk factors were present in approximately 29.8% (51/171) of the cases. SSNHL was more often unilateral than bilateral for both mRNA vaccines (P<.001 for tozinameran; P<.003 for elasomeran). There were 13.5% (23/142) of cases of profound hearing loss, among which 74% (17/23) did not recover a serviceable ear. A positive rechallenge was documented for 8 cases. CONCLUSIONS: SSNHL after COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are very rare adverse events that do not call into question the benefits of mRNA vaccines but deserve to be known given the potentially disabling impact of sudden deafness. Therefore, it is essential to properly characterize postinjection SSNHL, especially in the case of a positive rechallenge, to provide appropriate individualized recommendations.

Peripheral facial palsy post SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: A regional pharmacovigilance cases series.

Peripheral facial palsy (PFP) is a rare adverse reaction identified from clinical trials of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines (messenger ribonucleic acid [mRNA] and viral vector). Few data are available on their onset patterns and risk of recurrence after re-injection of a COVID-19 vaccine; the objective of this study was to describe PFP cases attributed to COVID-19 vaccines. All cases of facial paralysis reported to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Centre-Val de Loire area between January and October 2021, in which the role of a COVID-19 vaccine was suspected, were selected. Based on initial data and following additional information requested, each case was reviewed and analyzed to include only confirmed cases of PFP for which the role of the vaccine could be retained. From the 38 cases reported, 23 were included (15 excluded because of diagnosis not retained). They occurred in 12 men and 11 women (median age of 51 years). The first clinical manifestations occurred with a median time of 9 days after COVID-19 vaccine injection, and the paralysis was homolateral to the vaccinated arm in 70%. The etiological workup, always negative, included brain imaging (48%), infectious serologies (74%) and Covid-19 PCR (52%). Corticosteroid therapy was prescribed for 20 (87%) patients, combined with aciclovir in 12 (52%). At 4-month follow-up, clinical manifestations had regressed completely or partially in 20 (87%) of the 23 patients (median time of 30 days). From them 12 (60%) received another dose of COVID-19 vaccine and none had a recurrence and the PFP regressed despite the second dose in 2 of the 3 patients not fully recovered at 4 months. The potential mechanism of PFP after COVID-19 vaccine, which don't have a specific profile, is probably the interferon-γ. Moreover, the risk of recurrence after a new injection appears to be very low, which makes it possible to continue the vaccination.

Sex differences in adverse drug reactions: Are women more impacted?

Pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology studies regarding the sex difference in adverse drug reactions are numerous, and it is now a challenge to take them into account in order to increase drug safety. Here, we present an overview of this topic through data on epidemiology, mechanisms, and methods used for assessing sex differences in drug safety. Because the literature is extensive, we choose to expose a few examples of studies for cardiovascular drugs, anti-infectious, psychotropics, antidiabetics, anticancer drugs and some specific drugs to illustrate our purpose. Many studies show a higher risk in women for most of drugs involving in sex differences. However, physiological, methodological and subjective points have to be taken into account to interpret these results. Clinical trials must also enroll more women to better evaluate sex differences both in efficacy and pharmacovigilance. Nevertheless, when there is a pharmacological rationale underlying the observed association between sex and drug safety profile, it is now unavoidable to think about its consideration for a personalized prescription.

Adverse effects of gender-affirming hormonal therapy in transgender persons: Assessing reports in the French pharmacovigilance database.

Limited data are available on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of gender-affirming hormone therapy (HT), mainly due to the lack of population-based studies with adequate controls, thus making spontaneous reporting systems a valuable tool to detect potential side reactions. In this nationwide retrospective study, we aimed to analyze ADRs related to gender-affirming HT reported in the French pharmacovigilance database (FPVD). We requested all the individual case safety reports related to gender-affirming HT recorded in the FPVD before May 27, 2020. We excluded previously published cases and those where gender-affirming HT was not the suspected drug. A total of 28 reports of ADRs were identified. Six concerned transgender men (21-40 years) and 22 transgender women (22-68 years). In transgender men taking testosterone enanthate, all reported ADRs were cardiovascular events, with pulmonary embolism in 50% of cases. Median time to onset (TTO) was 34 months. In transgender women, antiandrogens, mainly cyproterone acetate, were involved in 68% of cases, and estrogens in 77% of cases, mostly in association with progestin or cyproterone acetate. Meningiomas were the principal ADRs, followed by cardiovascular events, with a median TTO of 5.3 months. Our data show a previously unreported, non-negligible proportion of cases indicating cardiovascular ADRs in transgender men younger than 40 years. In transgender women, cardiovascular events were the second most frequent ADR. Further research is necessary to identify risk factors that might help to the individualization of treatment strategies. There is a necessity to increase awareness, implement preventive and education measures.

Delayed thrombocytopenia following administration of abciximab: Pharmacovigilance survey and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Abciximab (ABX) is used for acute coronary syndrome and unstable angina. Thrombocytopenia is a frequent adverse effect described as occurring in the first 24hours. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a context of pharmacovigilance survey, the occurrence of delayed thrombocytopenia following ABX infusion in pharmacovigilance database reports and in the literature. METHODS: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of delayed thrombocytopenia-between 3 and 30 days - with ABX presented as a single suspect were selected in VigiBase®, the WHO global database of ICSRs. The French cases were then extracted from the French national pharmacovigilance database. In addition, a literature review of published cases was performed using PubMed. RESULTS: Among the 84 ICSRs selected from VigiBase®, 43 were also reported in the FPVD. Mean age was 60.1±12.3 years with a majority of male patients (77.4%). The average time to onset (TTO) was 8.9±5.2 days. Thrombocytopenia regressed in 5.1±2.7 days. Haemorrhagic complications were reported in 15% of ICSRs. In the French cases, the median nadir of platelet count was 28×109/L (range 1-110) with a majority of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (39.5%). The literature review identified 42 cases and provided additional information on administered therapies, which include platelet units, corticosteroids, and IV immunoglobulins. GPIIb/IIIa-ABX complex antibodies were described in 26 published cases. CONCLUSION: Delayed thrombocytopenia, probably due to immune reaction, is a possible life-threatening adverse effect of ABX with a mean TTO of 9 days, supporting the recommendation of a platelet count monitoring during at least two weeks. This recommendation was added to the abcximab SmPC in 2019.